@article {597,
	title = {More Than Half of Mobile Users Avoid Certain Apps Due to Privacy Concerns},
	year = {2012},
	month = {09/2012},
	institution = {Pew Research Center{\textquoteright}s Internet \& American Life Project},
	type = {Report},
	address = {Washington, D.C. },
	abstract = {More than half of mobile application users have uninstalled or avoided certain apps due to concerns about the way personal information is shared or collected by the app, according to a nationally representative telephone survey conducted by the Pew Research Center{\textquoteright}s Internet \& American Life Project.},
	keywords = {App, Privacy},
	url = {http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_MobilePrivacyManagement.pdf},
	author = {Jan Lauren Boyles and Aaron Smith and Mary Madden}
}
@article {371,
	title = {Who watches the watchers? Towards an ethic of surveillance in a digital age},
	journal = {Studies in Christian Ethics},
	volume = {21},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {362-381},
	abstract = {The essay considers contemporary surveillance strategies from a Christian ethical perspective. It discusses first surveillance as a form of speech in the light of biblical themes of truthfulness, then draws on principles of subsidiarity and solidarity. Surveillance is dignified as human work whilst its dehumanizing outcomes are challenged. It is concluded that surveillance must contribute to human dignity and that accountability for data must follow a revised model of subsidiarity, appropriate to network rather than linear socio-political relationships. Mutual responsibility for one another{\textquoteright}s data-image is derived from solidarity which, further, offers a response to the angst of a culture of suspicion.},
	keywords = {Digital, Privacy, Surveillance},
	url = {http://sce.sagepub.com/content/21/3/362.abstract},
	author = {Stoddart, E.}
}
