@inbook {2111,
	title = {Film, television, and new media studies},
	booktitle = {The Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Jewish Cultures},
	year = {2014},
	publisher = {Routledge},
	organization = {Routledge},
	edition = {1},
	chapter = {8},
	address = {London},
	abstract = {Screen sources, such as film, television, and new media, are valuable resources for studying both the Jewish past and the present. This is, in part, because of their reliance on visual stereotypes to communicate information quickly and easily. Stereotypes are regularly repeated, simplistic, easily understood, and (often) inaccurate categorizations of a social group (Abrams et al. 2010: 365). Stereotypes in general, and Jewish ones in particular, fulfill many functions and much has been written about this especially in terms of how they perform cultural work in demonizing minority groups from the outside, and perpetuating group solidarity and continuity from the inside. Since stereotypes do not stay static and because screen media tend to rely on them, they

allow us to map and track wider changes in the society from which those texts originate. They {\textquotedblleft}change because the cultural patterns on which they are based are becoming anachronistic{\textquotedblright} (Antler 1998: 256). Likewise, screen stereotypes of Jews, existing almost as long as the media themselves, have evolved, and a diachronic study of screen media allows us to map the metamorphosis of the Jew/ess and what this tells us about the societies in which they live at any given point in time. For these reasons, then, the study of Jewish film, television, and new media is a highly pro-

ductive field with its own specific histories, identities, agents, productions, production contexts, industries, and festivals.},
	keywords = {film, New Media, Television},
	issn = {978-0415473781},
	url = {https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781135048556},
	author = {Abrams, N}
}
@mastersthesis {1248,
	title = {TV : Satan or Savior? : Protestant responses to television in the 1950s},
	volume = {The Divinity School},
	year = {1999},
	school = {University of Chicago},
	type = {Doctoral Thesis},
	keywords = {1950, communication research, Mass media, media and religion, Protestant, Television},
	url = {http://www.worldcat.org/title/tv-satan-or-savior-protestant-responses-to-television-in-the-1950s/oclc/43658625},
	author = {Michele Ann Rosenthal}
}
@conference {1895,
	title = {Representations de la diversit{\'e} religieuse {\`a} la t{\'e}l{\'e}vision publique},
	booktitle = {4th Workshop international Essachess: M{\'e}dia, spiritualit{\'e} et la{\"\i}cit{\'e} : Regards crois{\'e}s franco-roumains},
	year = {2015},
	month = {12/2015},
	publisher = {Iarsic},
	organization = {Iarsic},
	address = {Bucarest-Villa Noel},
	abstract = {Le probl{\`e}me que je pose dans ce cadre consiste {\`a} voir quel sont les pratiques des m{\'e}dias de service public {\`a} l{\textquoteright}{\'e}gard des repr{\'e}sentations de la diversit{\'e} religieuse et, plus pr{\'e}cis{\'e}ment, {\`a} l{\textquoteright}{\'e}gard des repr{\'e}sentations de transmission et communication de la foi dans deux pays europ{\'e}ens dont l{\textquoteright}un fort religieux et l{\textquoteright}autre fort la{\"\i}c, la Roumanie et la France. Il est question de voir en quoi le discours des m{\'e}dias publics sur la diversit{\'e} n{\textquoteright}alt{\`e}re pas le principe de la la{\"\i}cit{\'e}, la neutralit{\'e}, le respect du pluralisme et l{\textquoteright}int{\'e}gralit{\'e} des consciences. Pour ce faire, je vais retenir deux cas de figure, deux {\'e}missions t{\'e}l{\'e}vis{\'e}es diffus{\'e}es sur les cha{\^\i}nes publiques de t{\'e}l{\'e}vision en France et en Roumanie : l{\textquoteright}{\'e}mission {\guillemotleft} Le jour du Seigneur {\guillemotright}, avec ses d{\'e}clinaisons d{\textquoteright}intitul{\'e} au fil du temps {\guillemotleft} Programme du dimanche {\guillemotright} et {\guillemotleft} Les chemins de la foi {\guillemotright}, diffus{\'e}e sur France 2 et {\guillemotleft} Universul credintei {\guillemotright} ({\guillemotleft} l{\textquoteright}Univers de la foi {\guillemotright}) diffus{\'e}e sur TVR1. En consid{\'e}rant ces deux programmes de t{\'e}l{\'e}vision, je vais tenter de r{\'e}pondre globalement aux questionnements suivants : est-ce que tous les mouvements religieux sont-ils pr{\'e}sents dans les m{\'e}dias audiovisuels publics autant que les acteurs des confessions religieuses traditionnellement implant{\'e}es ? Oui, c{\textquoteright}est une r{\'e}alit{\'e}, certains mouvements disposent de leurs propres cha{\^\i}nes, mais leur pr{\'e}sence sur leurs cha{\^\i}nes priv{\'e}es ne remplace pas un droit par un autre. S{\textquoteright}agit-t-il alors d{\textquoteright}une situation de monopole et de visibilit{\'e} maximale des courants religieux dominants dans l{\textquoteright}espace public au travers des m{\'e}dias publics ? Plus de normalisation garantit plus d{\textquoteright}acc{\`e}s compte tenu que le principe de la{\"\i}cit{\'e} pr{\'e}voit l{\textquoteright}{\'e}galit{\'e} et l{\textquoteright}absence de hi{\'e}rarchie entre les diff{\'e}rentes croyances et cultes ?},
	keywords = {cultural diversity, Faith, freedom of opinion, laicism, pluralism, public institution, religion, religious community representation, Television},
	isbn = {978-2-9532450-6-6},
	url = {http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/45739/ssoar-2015-tudor-Representations_de_la_diversite_religieuse.pdf?sequence=3},
	author = {Tudor, Mihaela-Alexandra}
}
